Logo-jmp
Submitted: 16 Nov 2016
Revision: 19 Nov 2016
Accepted: 19 Nov 2016
ePublished: 19 Nov 2016
EndNote EndNote

(Enw Format - Win & Mac)

BibTeX BibTeX

(Bib Format - Win & Mac)

Bookends Bookends

(Ris Format - Mac only)

EasyBib EasyBib

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Medlars Medlars

(Txt Format - Win & Mac)

Mendeley Web Mendeley Web
Mendeley Mendeley

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Papers Papers

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

ProCite ProCite

(Ris Format - Win & Mac)

Reference Manager Reference Manager

(Ris Format - Win only)

Refworks Refworks

(Refworks Format - Win & Mac)

Zotero Zotero

(Ris Format - Firefox Plugin)

J Med Physiol. 2016;1(2): 55-59.
  Abstract View: 3
  PDF Download: 5

Original Research

The effect of fluid therapy on hemodynamic and venous blood gas parameters in patients with septic shock

Sahar Mirbaha, Abdelrahman Ibrahim Abushouk, Ahmed Negida, Alaleh Rouhipour, Alireza Baratloo*
*Corresponding Author: Email: alirezabaratloo@yahoo.com

Abstract

Background: Hemodynamics and venous blood gas (VBG) may be used to guide fluid therapy in septic shock patients. However, the influence of fluid therapy on hemodynamic and blood gas parameters is not fully understood. In this study, we aimed to investigate the effect of fluid therapy on hemodynamic and VBG parameters.

Methods: This cross-sectional study was conducted from January to April 2016. All patients with diagnosis of severe sepsis were enrolled in the study. Systolic blood pressure (SBP), diastolic blood pressure (DBP), mean arterial pressure (MAP), central venous pressure (CVP) shock index, VBG parameters, serum sodium (Na) and chloride (Cl) levels, anion gap, and oxygen saturation (O2sat) were assessed before fluid resuscitation, after resuscitation, and after fluid challenge test.

Results: A total of 100 patients were included (mean age were 72.54 ± 12.77 years, 66% male). Fluid therapy significantly increased DBP (df: 2; F= 4.17; p = 0.017), MAP (df: 2; F= 6.06; p= 0.003), and CVP (df: 2; F= 27.54; p < 0.001), while the shock index was significantly reduced After fluid challenge test (df: 2; F= 7.6; p= 0.001). In addition, fluid therapy had no effect on pH (p= 0.90), HCO3 (p= 0.23), base excess (p= 0.13), SCVO2 (p= 0.73), O2sat (p= 0.73), anion gap (p= 0.96), serum Na level (p= 0.71), and serum Cl level (p= 0.64).

Conclusion: Administration of fluid therapy in septic shock patients had no significant effect on SBP, heart rate, or blood gas parameters. Future studies on a larger sample of patients should confirm these findings and correlate them to clinical outcomes.

First Name
Last Name
Email Address
Comments
Security code


Abstract View: 4

Your browser does not support the canvas element.

PDF Download: 5

Your browser does not support the canvas element.