Ethical Considerations
1. Confidentiality:
1. Treat submitted manuscripts as confidential documents. Do not share or discuss the content with others.
2. Safeguard the authors’ intellectual property by maintaining confidentiality throughout the review process.
2. Conflict of Interest:
1. Disclose any potential conflicts of interest that may affect your impartiality during the review.
2. Transparency ensures unbiased evaluation.
3. Timeliness:
1. Review manuscripts promptly and provide constructive feedback within the stipulated time frame.
2. Timely reviews contribute to efficient editorial processes.
4. Objectivity:
1. Evaluate manuscripts objectively, focusing on scientific merit rather than personal biases.
2. Your assessment should be fair and evidence-based.
Review Process
1. Initial Assessment:
1. Evaluate the manuscript’s relevance, originality, and adherence to the journal’s scope.
2. Consider whether the research addresses important clinical questions or contributes significantly to medical knowledge.
2. Methodology and Rigor:
1. Assess the study design, sample size, statistical methods, and data quality.
2. Look for any potential biases or limitations.
3. Results and Interpretation:
1. Evaluate the clarity and accuracy of the reported results.
2. Consider whether the conclusions are supported by the data.
4. References and Citations:
1. Check the appropriateness and completeness of the reference list.
2. Ensure proper citation of relevant literature.
5. Language and Clarity:
1. Pay attention to the clarity of writing, organization, and overall readability.
2. Suggest improvements if needed.